By Jill Krueger
Wagner
What would have been
Christ’s motivation in each of these judgments?
Jesus told Peter that he was a stumbling block and that he
did not have in mind the things of God, but of men. Satan was using Peter to
tempt Jesus not to follow the path of God’s will. This was certainly a teaching
moment, for Jesus then told the disciples that if they wanted to follow him,
they must deny themselves, take up the cross and follow him. What was Jesus’
motivation? Was it to have Peter understand that he was being used? Was it to
show Peter and the other disciples to rethink their view of why the Messiah
came, or was it to explain they needed to count the cost of following him?
Although we don’t know precisely what his motives were, we do know is it was for Peter’s good.
The woman caught in adultery probably knew she was seeking
fulfillment in men rather than God before the teachers of the law and the
Pharisees dragged her before Jesus. Now she was face to face with the
tenderhearted man whose wisdom had just saved her from being stoned to death.
His demeanor was certainly nothing like those who had brought her before
him. She may have assumed God was OK
with what she did since she hadn’t fallen under Christ’s condemnation, but
Christ had a responsibility to let her know that her lifestyle was sinful. He
didn’t condemn her, but he also didn’t condone her behavior. "Unconditional love does not mean unconditional acceptance of bad behavior." His motivation was certainly for her good (See
Galatians 5:20-12).
In John 15:14 after Jesus healed the
man at the Pool of Bethsaida, he told him to “Stop sinning or
something worse may happen to you.” Again, Jesus
seeks the man’s good.
In John 4 he was quite blunt with the woman
who had 5 husbands. He said, “You Samaritan’s worship what you do not know, we
worship what we do know, for salvation is from the Jews.” He debunked the lie
that every form of worship results in salvation. He then proceeded to reveal
himself as the messiah leading not only to her salvation but also to many in her
village. Jesus sought her good and the
good of her community.
When it came to the religious leaders of the day, many were
worthless shepherds of the flock of God. As the good shepherd he had to call
them into account for misusing their power and misleading the sheep. Jesus was
following a precedent that God set in the Old Testament. There we learn that
God used judgment to seek justice and speed the cause of the righteous (Isaiah
16:5), to save all the afflicted and teach restraint (Psalm 76:9-10) and to
winnow out evil (Proverbs 20:8).
The religious leaders taught that following rules was the
only way to please God. In Matthew 23, Jesus called them out for the following:
·
They did things for show
·
They were proud, lacking a servant’s heart
·
They were teaching others to follow their
loveless ways
·
They were being blind guides, altering Scripture
·
They neglected the love of God, justice, mercy,
and faithfulness
·
They were greedy and self-indulgent
·
They were full of hypocrisy and wickedness
These leaders were in danger of going to hell (Mt. 23:33).
Was it unloving for Jesus to call them out? Not at all – it could have saved
their lives, it was for their good.
Consistently when Jesus judges, his judgments are always meant
for good. Furthermore, contrary to current thought, the church is also to judge for the good of others. I will cover
that in my next blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment